Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 102:6

ר"ש דתניא אמר להו ר"ש לחכמים אם ביאת ראשון ביאה ביאת שני אינה ביאה אם ביאת ראשון אינה ביאה ביאת שני נמי אינה ביאה והא ביאת בן תשע דכמאמר שויוה רבנן וקאמר ר' שמעון אינה ביאה

R. Simeon? — For it was taught: R. Simeon said to the Sages: If the cohabitation of the first<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of two young levirs of the ages of nine years and one day. According to the Rabbis, if two levirs of such an age cohabited successively with their sister-in-law, the widow of their deceased brother, their acts have the same force as that of a ma'amar that followed a ma'amar. As with a ma'amar the second has also the validity of a betrothal and causes the prohibition of the sister-in-law to the first, so with cohabitation, the act of the second levir causes the sister-in-law to be forbidden to the first levir also. R. Simeon, however, regards the first act only as a valid kinyan. The other consequently is invalid. V. infra 96b. ');">¹⁴</span> is a valid act,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Effecting a kinyan. ');">¹⁵</span> that of the second cannot have any validity<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The kinyan of the first would not admit it. ');">¹⁶</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 102:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.